RGV Republican Liberty Club

Promoting Liberty & Freedom in the Rio Grande Valley

Browsing Posts published by Kevin

Editorial from Texas Conservative Digest:

The war between the Republican elite (those that run the party) and the Republican base continues at a massive destructive pace.

As has been the case in so many past elections (Gerald Ford, 1976; Bob Dole, 1996; John McCain, 2008), the GOP elite forces its ‘chosen’ Presidential candidate in a manner befitting a King.  Neither Ford, Dole or McCain had a prayer of winning those elections and almost everyone knew it – long before the Republican nominating convention.  But the GOP, in its role of holding onto ‘Party Leadership Power’, insanely continues its practice of ‘Coronation’ for the next person in line – winning or losing of the general election is not what is most important.

“But they nominated Reagan!”  No; THEY did not.  Beginning with the now famous speech by then Gov. Ronald Reagan, immediately after the elites nominated Ford in ‘76 – the people of America AND the rank and file delegates to the ’76 convention knew who their nominee would be in 1980.  The GOP ran George Bush against Reagan to hopefully accomplish their ever pressing agenda of keeping a conservative out of the Presidential position; but the PEOPLE virtually over-ran the elites – something they had never happen before – and something they have never forgotten!

The nomination process of 2012, sadly, continues in the old tradition of GOP Coronations.  The elites have picked their coronation King in the form of one Mitt Romney.  Mr. Romney – and Mr. Romney alone, meets their 4-point test with flying colors:

1.  His credentials are anything but conservative;

2.  He is ‘in line’ for the coronation;

3.  He is one of the ‘them’; and

4. He will not threaten their party leadership positions.

Their view? If he wins, great; if not, so be it.  Win or lose, the elites will maintain their position, power and control over a conservative base that has long since decided that ONLY the Democrats are the problem – certainly not OUR leaders.

Georgette Mosbacher, “Queen Bee” of the liberal republican elites, brazenly and proudly announced back in early October:

“We do not consider Perry a factor… We know who will be our nominee.”
She was of course talking about Mitt “Romneycare” Romney.

Mosbacher and her associates were instrumental in having the Virginia election laws changed recently so as to be sure there were only two GOP candidates on the upcoming primary ballot, effectively eliminating everyone else.  But then, the ‘dirty tricks’ that the  GOP elite have pulled on their own Republican base, could fill volumes.

2012 is, without question, the most important election of our time.  Our country has been taken over by a group whose sole intention is to eliminate the Constitution of the United States and by so doing will force upon its citizenry a government so tyrannical, we will not recognize our own country.  If Obama is successful in 2012, and there is growing evidence that he very well may be -  the last four years will look like an elementary school picnic compared to what will come.  If this scenario becomes fact instead of the dreaded possibility, you and I will see the departure of the last ‘free’ nation on this planet.  But never fear, the Republican elites will certainly find a way to maintain THEIR position – no matter who wins in November.

According to Roll Call, Hinojosa is worth negative $881,000! Wow! No wonder Hidalgo county is so broke, when our Representative in DC can’t even pay his own bills!

The Trib reports:

Louie Gohmert (l), Republican of Tyler, Rubén Hinojosa (c), Democrat of Edinburg and Silvestre Reyes (r), Democrat of El Paso

Enlargephoto illustration by: Todd Wiseman
Louie Gohmert (l), Republican of Tyler, Rubén Hinojosa (c), Democrat of Edinburg and Silvestre Reyes (r), Democrat of El Paso

WASHINGTON — Texas multimillionaire Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Austin, recently topped a list of Congress’s wealthiest members, and five other Texans joined him in the top 50.

But less well known are the Texas members on the other end of Congress’s net-worth spectrum, including Reps. Rubén Hinojosa, D-Edinburg; Louie Gohmert, R-Tyler; andSilvestre Reyes, D-El Paso.

A low net worth can pose a challenge to lawmakers trying to maintain one home in their district and another in Washington, current and former members say. But it also proves that you do not have to be a millionaire to serve in the people’s house — and that, some say, is an important point to make.

A diverse Congress “on all levels” makes for better legislation and more tuned-in lawmakers, Hinojosa said through a spokesman. Hinojosa, a former president of a food-processing company, is the least-wealthy Texas member — and is in Congress’s bottom 10, according to Roll Call, the Capitol Hill newspaper, which estimated his net worth at negative $881,000.

His annual federal financial disclosure, which establishes a range of values for many of the members’ personal assets and liabilities, puts his average net worth at about negative $2.67 million. He declared personal bankruptcy last year, attributing it to his liability for a bank loan to the troubled food-processing company.

 

From Real Clear Politics:

Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) says President Obama’s continued use of the executive order “brings the modern presidency dangerously close to an elective dictatorship.”

“That is arrogant,” Paul said of Obama frequently using the executive order function as of late. “It is flaunting the Constitution and the whole principle of how we’re supposed to operate. The idea they can just do this and take over the legislative function and brag about it — and Congress does nothing and the courts do nothing about it, it’s very, very bad.”

“He’s dictatorial, is what he is,” Rep. Paul said before the end of the interview.

Latest Rasmussen Poll has Ron Paul in 3rd place amongst likely voters in the New Hampshire GOP Primaries, only 5 points behind 2nd place Rick Perry. Mitt Romney takes the lead at 39 points.

The cost of the so-called “War on Terror” has added $3.2 TRILLION to our debt. Think on that next time you claim to be a Conservative yet are in support of this heinous legislation. Never mind the cost of the thing, though. Let’s take a look at where it’s warrant powers have actually been used. Using the so-called “delayed notice warrants” has become a great application for Federal Agents to use in their war against Terrorism. It is so useful, that they have only used it 15 times under the Patriot Act. Yes, 15 whole times. Conversely, the same warrant has been used 122 for fraud and 1,618 for drugs. What?!? Don’t we have enough legislation here already? Why do we need these emergency measures that give Agents in the field the authority with no oversight to just barge into private property to execute a “delayed notice warrant”? 3.2 trillion dollars spent, and what has it been spent on but Johnny getting high on a dose of marijuana in his apartment.. Think on that next time you claim to be a Conservative, and recognize that you are in favor of adding that immense cost to our already immense debt burden just so you can feel good about yourself for being “against Terrorism”.

Agora Financial has put together a great writeup on just what the costs of this war have come to.

In the latest failure of Federal Government Agencies, we see that FEMA has now taken over the disastrous wildfires in and around Bastrop county. Oh goody, the Feds are here, we’re safe! Wrong. They have actually turned away firefighters from across the state who have driven to Bastrop (often many long hours in this Big State) to help fight the wild fires because there has not been an “official request” for volunteers. Isn’t it just like the Federal Government to get in your way! Over 1,000 houses have been burned to the ground, and the Federal Badges come out, telling everyone that they’re in charge. Meanwhile, the lives of everyone in the area are being significantly impacted while they twiddle their thumbs.

NaturalNews reports:

As fires raged across central Texas for the past three days, local citizens sprang into action to protect their lives and property. Local churches opened their doors and began hosting refugees left homeless by the fires which have now destroyed more than 1,000 homes and 100,000 acres across the state in just the past week. Several branches of the YMCA also began hosting families with children, and a public school in Bastrop County opened its doors to serve as an emergency relief center.

See a YouTube video of a citizen’s narrow escape around Highway 21 near Bastrop, Texas:

Federal agencies seize control on Tuesday

Hundreds of firefighters from all the surrounding counties worked two days and nights in a heroic effort to contain the fires, but high winds Sunday night and all day Monday thwarted their efforts. So the call went out for more volunteer firefighters to join the effort from across the state.

Before they arrived, however, the federal government showed up and claimed it was in charge of the situation. “Agents with the federal National Interagency Fire Center, a coalition of federal agencies including the U.S. Forest Service, assumed command of firefighting efforts Tuesday afternoon,” reports The Gonzales Cannon (http://www.gonzalescannon.com/node/6411).

RealNewsReporter.com is now reporting that volunteer firefighters who had in some cases driven all night to reach Bastrop county were turned away by the feds, who claimed that since local officials never made a “formal request” for volunteers, the volunteers could not be “activated.”

So while Bastrop County burns from 40+ fires that are still raging, the federal government is actuallytelling volunteer firefighters to go home.

“We were at the station getting set up into strike teams, and this guy came up and said that the U.S. Forest Service had ‘assumed control of the situation, and that If you don’t have a vehicle that squirts water, go home,’ said Gordon Greer of Kirbyville, in a RealNewsReporter article (http://www.realnewsreporter.com/?p=7889). Gordon reportedly drove all night Monday to arrive in Bastrop and take part in the firefighting effort. “You’ve got guys who had driven all night long from Corpus Christi and Brownsville on their own dime, and they turned them away,” he said.

That same story reports that Jennifer Jones of theU.S. National Interagency Incident Centerconfirmed multiple federal agencies would be taking over the scene. Tuesday afternoon, the Bastrop County Office of Emergency Management stated on its Facebook page that volunteer firefighters would have to be “activated by the National Forestry Service first.”

In other words, if you’re a local Texan and you want to help other Texans save their ranches, or their homes, or their businesses,you need permission from the federal bureaucracy first!

But some Texans aren’t allowing their efforts to be thwarted. As Real News Reporter says in its story, a group ofTexas Nationalist Movement memberswho are also certified firefighters are in the Bastrop area and aiding civilian relief efforts, with or without permission from Washington D.C.

Texas volunteer firefighters buy their own gear!

Many of the volunteers currently fighting the wildfires in Texas buy their own gear! Please consider supporting them through theTexas Wildfire Relief Fund:

http://txwildfirerelief.org/

“Over 77 percent of fire departments in Texas are volunteer departments who struggle daily on getting the equipment they need to respond to emergencies across the state,” said Chief Chris Barron, Director of the State Firemen’s and Fire Marshals’ Association of Texas (SFFMA). “Eighty-six percent of the state’s volunteer firefighters use personal funds for their departments’ safety equipment and supply needs.” (http://www.globenewswire.com/newsro…)

Thanks always to the Texas Tribune for their excellent coverage! With this announcement, this all but guarantees that Lt. Governor David Dewhurst will become the Junior Senator for Texas. It also means he won’t have to spend much of his vast fortune to take the seat.

State Sen. Dan Patrick, R-Houston, listens to an aide on the Senate floor on May 16, 2011.

Enlargephoto by: Bob Daemmrich
State Sen. Dan Patrick, R-Houston, listens to an aide on the Senate floor on May 16, 2011.

State Rep. Dan Patrick, R-Houston, officially announced today that he will not run for the seat currently occupied by outgoing U.S. Sen.Kay Bailey Hutchison, but that he is mulling a run for lieutenant governor.

Patrick, who had been strongly considering entering the U.S. Senate race, says “many key factors” led to his decision, among them a concern about the possibility of a dramatic rearrangement of government leaders on the state’s horizon.

Patrick anticipates that Gov. Rick Perry will be the Republican presidential nominee and that there’s “a strong possibility” he moves to the White House. Also, Patrick said of the current U.S. Senate race, “If you look at the race today, it is likely — especially with me out of the field — that [Lt. Gov. David] Dewhurst wins.”

Under that scenario, with Perry and Dewhurst departing simultaneously, the Texas Senate would select replacements for the governor and lieutenant governor from within its ranks. “I want to be in the middle of these decisions so that I can be sure we have the right conservative in that position, if it’s not me,” Patrick told the Tribune.

There will be further shuffling of the state’s leadership in 2014, and Patrick is keeping his options open. As he traveled the state gauging support for his ultimately nixed U.S. Senate bid, Patrick said he was repeatedly urged to run for either of the two top statewide spots.

Patrick told the Tribune he expects Attorney General Greg Abbott to be the next governor and will support him. But he’ll “consider very seriously” running for the No. 2 spot — and a decision could come sooner rather than later. Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson, Agriculture Commissioner Todd Staples and Comptroller Susan Combs have already expressed interest in that race.

“With three people already declared, raising money and getting endorsements, I can’t wait until after next session to make that decision,” Patrick said.

The New American reports:

As Texas Governor and GOP frontrunner Rick Perry took criticism from nearly all his rivals at a September 7 GOP presidential debate at the Reagan Library, Perry quipped: “I kinda feel like the Pinata here at the party.” But only his fellow Texan, Congressman Ron Paul, got Perry to back down.

Perry took numerous vague barbs from just about all the other candidates in his first debate as a presidential candidate, but Ron Paul got specific. Asked if Perry was “less conservative than meets the eye,” Paul responded: “Much more so. Just take the HPV. Forcing 12-year-old girls to take an inoculation to prevent a sexually transmitted disease, this is not good medicine, I do not believe. It’s not good social policy.”

Paul then proceeded to criticize sharply the method by which Perry created the mandatory vaccines of thousands of Texas pre-teens: “But one of the worst parts about that is the way it was done. The governorship in the State of Texas traditionally, is supposed to be a weak governorship. I didn’t even know they could pass laws by writing an executive order.  He did it with an executive order. Passed it. But the state was furious. And the legislature overwhelmingly repealed this. But I think it was the way it was passed — which was so bad, I think it’s such a bad piece of legislation — but I don’t like the idea of executive orders. I as President will not use executive orders to write laws.”

Perry acknowledged that he created the order by executive fiat, ignoring the Texas legislature: “There was an opt-out in that piece of … it wasn’t legislation it was an executive order,” Perry responded. Then he added: “Should we have talked to the legislature first before we did it? Probably so. But at the end of the day, I will always err on the side of saving lives.”

Another sharp exchange between the two took place over the namesake of the debate location: Ronald Reagan. The Paul campaign aired a television commercial nationally during the debate entitled “Trust.” The campaign aid highlighted Ron Paul’s early endorsement of Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign (he was one of only four congressmen to endorse Reagan in 1976) and Rick Perry’s endorsement of Al Gore’s presidential campaign in 1988. The ad concludes with the following statement:

After Reagan, Al Gore ran for President, pledging to raise taxes and increase spending, pushing his liberal values. And Al Gore found a cheerleader in Texas named Rick Perry. Rick Perry helped lead Al Gore’s campaign to undo the Reagan revolution, fighting to elect Al Gore President of the United States. Now, America must decide who to trust: Al Gore’s Texas cheerleader or the one who stood with Reagan.

 

Ron Paul followed his campaign’s television ad up with a critique of Perry tying the former Democrat even more tightly to the liberal Clinton-Gore administration: “The Governor of Texas criticized the governor of Massachusetts for Romneycare, but he wrote a really fancy letter supporting Hillarycare.”

Rick Perry responded: “I was the Agriculture Commissioner at that particular point in time. We had no idea it was going to be the monstrosity that’s known as Hillarycare.” Perry has responded to critiques like this in similar fashion in recent weeks. And MSNBC.com reported August 31 that something is amiss with Perry’s storyline: “It is true that the precise details of the plan were unclear at the time and the process of hashing out the policy was (now infamously) opaque. But some of the broad goals of the legislation were being reported at the same time Perry was penning praise to Clinton.”

Perry immediately counter-attacked Paul, reminding the audience that Paul had briefly left the Republican Party at the end of the Reagan presidency to run for President in 1988 as a Libertarian. “Speaking of letters, I was more interested in the one that you wrote to Ronald Reagan back … and said I’m going to quit the party because of the things that you believe in.”

Paul, given 30 seconds to reply to Perry, responded: “I strongly supported Ronald Reagan. I was one of four in Texas, one of the four members of Congress that supported him in 1976. And I supported him all along. And I supported all his issues and all his programs. But in the 1980s, we spent too much, we taxed too much, we built up our deficits and it was a bad scene. Therefore, I support the message of Ronald Reagan. The message was great. But the consequence — we have to be honest with ourselves — it was not all that great. Huge deficits during the 1980s. And that is what my criticism was for, not for Ronald Reagan’s message. His message was a great message.” Ron Paul didn’t mention it, but he was also the only presidential candidate on that California stage to have been endorsed for election by Reagan.

With a quadruple hit on issues of mandatory inoculations, dictatorial-style executive orders, support for Al Gore, and support for Hillarycare, Ron Paul may have been the only candidate to strike political blood in the quick and seamless political ascendancy of Perry’s short presidential campaign.

Moreover, Paul is becoming central to the GOP primary race. Paul, who is polling in the 9-13 percent range in national polls (and stronger in early primary states), generally places third in polls after Perry and Romney. But his ideas continue to exert a gravitational pull on the race. During the same debate Newt Gingrich called for Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke to be fired, and Rick Perry used the phrase “Keynesian economics,” implying its failures have tainted its adherents permanently. Both have been Ron Paul shibboleths for years, if not decades, but have become household terms since the housing bubble collapsed in 2007-08.

Photo of Rick Perry and Ron Paul: AP Images


Wow… Rick Perry graduated with a 2.5 GPA? Didn’t know that. Thanks Texas Tribune! Lots more interesting things to be seen here.